Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

MAGA Lawmaker Schooled By Democrat After He Tries To Claim That Intersex People Don't Exist

Andy Hopper; Lauren Ashley Simmons
Lone Star Left/YouTube

Republican Texas state Rep. Andy Hopper was called out by Democratic state Rep. Lauren Ashley Simmons after he wanted to eliminate funding for The University of Texas due to its LGBTQ+ programs without even knowing what "intersex" means.

In another case of Republican legislation based on ignorance, Texas MAGA Republican state Representative Andy Hopper embarrassed himself on the Texas House floor with a little help from Democratic Representative Lauren Ashley Simmons.

Hopper sought to add an amendment to a funding bill for the University of Texas at Austin to penalize the school for not eliminating any reference to non-White, cisgender, heteronormative people in their curriculum.


While introducing his amendment, Hopper stated:

"Despite repeated calls by our President, our governor, and our legislature, the University of Texas continues to put out an outsized focus offering degree programs and courses in lesbian, gay, and bisexual, transgender, queer studies and has continued a pattern of teaching discrimination hidden behind the words diversity, equity and inclusion."
"There are also programs that deny the unchangeable biological reality that there are only two sexes, male and female. These programs, and by extension this university, shall not be funded by tax dollars."

After Hopper yielded the floor for questions on his amendment, Democratic state Representative Simmons asked:

"Representative Hopper can you clarify what it means when a course does not comply with the biological reality that there are only two sexes?"

You can see their interaction here:

- YouTubeyoutu.be

Hopper responded:

"So if a course is teaching the student body of a university that gender is–that gender is somehow fluid, that there is some sort of way to change your gender, then that would violate what we're trying to say here."

Representative Simmons replied:

"So just for clarification before I move on, gender or [sex], can you clarify what you mean, 'cuz those are not one and the same."

Hopper continued to confuse gender with sex, saying:

"So when you're born and you have a set of chromosomes."

Representative Simmons pressed for clarity, asking:

"So are you speaking about–are you speaking about biological sex or are you speaking about gender, 'cuz one is scientific one is a social construct. 'Cuz I have a follow-up question."

Hopper was again confused, stating:

"Yeah, they're one and the same, ma'am."

Representative Simmons simply replied:

"That's not true. But moving on. Okay, so in the same vein, what about intersex individuals?"

Hopper—who previously touted an "unchangeable biological reality"—said:

"I don't even know what that means."

He then asked Representative Simmons to explain it to him.

She replied:

"I'll take it really slow. Since the beginning of time people have been born with either ambiguous genitalia or with or without ovaries, or both. And so those people from a biological standpoint exist."
"They're not mythical. It's not something we're making up. Which is why I asked you, are you speaking about gender or [sex] because, again, one is a social construct. One is more scientific-based. And that's why I was asking."

Hopper still insisted gender and biological sex were the same thing, claiming:

"So their gender is not a social construct. It's firmly rooted in biological reality."

After asking Hopper to repeat his misinformation, Representative Simmons asked:

"So again, intersex... intersex people... what about them? When we're talking about two biological sexes, what are we talking about when regarding intersex people?"

Instead of answering, Hopper asked Representative Simmons to explain intersex to him again.

Instead of repeating her explanation, Representative Simmons pointed out the absurdity of Hopper holding himself up as an authority on gender or biological sex.

@nowthisimpact

It might be time to bring sex ed back to Texas schools. During a Texas budget debate, Rep. Andy Hopper (R) proposed an amendment to completely cut state funding for UT Austin over its LGBTQIA+ and DEI-related programs. Rep. Lauren Ashley Simmons (D) patiently stepped up to educate him on intersex individuals. After nearly an hour of discussion, House parliamentarians ruled against Hopper’s amendment.

She said:

"You are not sure what intersex people are, if they exist or not, but you want to defund a program about something that you don't–that you don't quite understand."

Hopper—in typical MAGA Christian nationalist fashion—then turned to the Bible, saying:

"So the truth that is rooted in our biblical understanding that God set forth from the beginning of creation is that your gender is fixed at birth and you cannot change it."

But Representative Simmons wasn't falling for it.

She replied:

"Again, I want to clarify, gender as a social construct or a biological sex? And again you haven't yet answered my question about where do intersex people fall into that equation?"

Hopper then really displayed his ignorance of biology by replying:

"Yeah, those intersex individuals are still XX or XY. So you can't change that."

This prompted one of the Republicans gathered around Hopper to tug on his sleeve and quietly tell him:

"Andy, that is not true."

Representative Simmons then finished by moving to block consideration of Hopper's "biblically-based" amendment, telling the Texas House:

"Mr. Speaker, I raise a point of order against further consideration of the amendment under house rule 8, section 4, on the grounds that this amendment seeks to create general law through an appropriations bill."

People applauded Representative Simmons exposure of Hopper's ignorance.

@leftynavyseal/Bluesky


obsessed with texas representative Andy Hopper trying to claim that intersex people do not exist, only to be quickly told "Andy that's not true" bigots do not understand what they hate. they won't make an effort to
— casillus (@casillus.art) April 15, 2025 at 12:01 AM


www.lgbtqnation.com/2025/04/demo... “You are not sure what intersex people are, if they exist or not, but you want to defund a program about something that you don’t understand,” she said. “That’s why I’m seeking clarification.” Hopper would do better enrolling in the program to take courses

[image or embed]
— DrLouS (@drlous.bsky.social) April 15, 2025 at 11:19 PM


I have friends who are intersex, but I only know that because I am a safe place for people to be vulnerable and open. I'm guessing Rep. Andy Hopper of north Texas isn't.
— Sara Cress (@saracress.bsky.social) April 10, 2025 at 11:10 PM


This is why sex education is important. Andy Hopper doesn't realize that intersex people exist. "Andy, that's not true." 😂 Bless his heart. youtube.com/shorts/a6Bft...

[image or embed]
— Ben Sasser (@bensasser.bsky.social) April 15, 2025 at 2:30 PM


@derblab/Bluesky


he gets called out for trying to legislate something he's never heard of, when it's explained to him, he denies it exists, and then at the end, my favorite part, this lady (i don't know who she is) is caught on mic telling him he's telling lies www.youtube.com/shorts/a6Bft...

[image or embed]
— catastrophegirl (@catastrophegirl.bsky.social) April 15, 2025 at 6:47 PM

Hopper's amendment was eventually removed by Texas House parliamentarians after an hour of debate.

More from News/political-news

Donald Trump; Elon Musk
Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images; Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

Truth Social Crashed Amid Trump's Epic Feud With Musk—And The Error Screen Was Unintentionally On Point

As President Donald Trump and his one-time billionaire ally Elon Musk publicly feuded, Truth Social crashed due to a traffic surge—and while the circumstances behind the feud are stunning, sparking considerable online conversation, one thing that really got people going was that Truth Social's error screen was unintentionally, well, truthful, in relaying that there are "no truths" to be found on the platform.

The feud had been brewing since Tuesday, when Musk denounced a sweeping GOP-backed bill covering taxes, spending cuts, energy policy, and border security as a “disgusting abomination,” citing concerns over its projected impact on the national deficit. Musk has made clear he intends to either derail the legislation or push lawmakers to significantly revise it.

Keep ReadingShow less
person lying on bed reading book
Dessidre Fleming on Unsplash

People Who Sleep Naked Describe The Times It Backfired—And Oof

I make it a habit to travel with nice pajamas that I don't mind having other people see.

One reason why is because years ago on a business trip to St. Louis, Missouri, one of the other hotels near where we were staying had a minor fire in the middle of the night.

Keep ReadingShow less
Kate Shaw; Josh Hawley
C-SPAN

Law Professor Bluntly Debunks Hawley's Conspiracy About Why Number Of Trump Injunctions Is So High

On Tuesday, Kate Shaw, law professor at the University of Pennsylvania, testified before a Senate Judiciary subcommittee hearing on the role of the federal court system.

The Republican majority focused primarily on federal judges issuing nationwide injunctions that block the unconstitutional executive orders of MAGA Republican President Donald Trump and the Trump administration's illegal or unconstitutional actions.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots from @joyfullykrisandra's TikTok video
@joyfullykrisandra/TikTok

Mom Slams Bakery's Epic Fail After Ordering $200 Cake For Son's Graduation Party

The time of year has come for major celebrations, especially among families with graduates in their midst.

For those who want to throw a party to celebrate, they have to prepare one of the central features: a cake.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots from @tallertoddlers' TikTok video
@tallertoddlers/TikTok

Woman Horrified After Accidentally Shattering Roommate's $249 Louis Vuitton Chocolate Purse

There are a few "roommate etiquette" rules we should all be able to agree to: don't use or take something that doesn't belong to you, at least without asking; don't eat your roommate's food; and honestly, don't touch their food, especially with your bare hands.

A leading rule, however, should be: If you break something that belongs to your roommate, you should replace it.

Keep ReadingShow less